As there is much to read on this page, in April 2019, I applied to the ICO to order the MOJ to send me the unedited recording of the court hearing before the Nazi-like scum, District Judge Lee Jenkinson and pinstriped little shyster, Graham Wells, as proof to prosecute them for perverting the course of justice.

Involuntary Euthanasia Programme

Notorious Nazi propaganda poster reminding people of the cost of caring for the disabled - the "useless eaters".

Based on the stats released by the DWP for 2011, I refer to in my Foreword, I have estimated that since 2009, somewhere in the region of 150,000 have died within 12 weeks of having their benefits terminated by sanction - see document 'ESA Deaths 2011'*. Most of these deaths, of course, will be of those with mental and physical health problems. Government ministers often cry crocodile tears about the heart-rending stories associated with these deaths when by a fluke they enter the public domain. The question to be asked is "Are these deaths by accident or design?" I believe the Skeleton Argument of Andrew Cooke, the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, contains the answer to that. It states that the police only have a legal obligation to investigate breaches of Article 2 of Human Rights Act - Right to Life. Thereby, enabling the DWP and its officials to rob as many of us as it wants and by any means, of our legally entitled benefits and in many cases our lives, with impunity. See the document 'Police Betrayal'.

* The stats show that 7,100 of the 10,600 who died were in the Support Group - those with the most serious health conditions who, according to Citizens Advice, "can't be sanctioned". Why on earth should such vulnerable people ever be sanctioned? The answer to that one is bleedin' obvious!

ESA Deaths 2011

Between January and November 2011, 10,600 claimants died within 6 weeks of having their ESA terminated. Let's say 12,000 for 12 months. How many died within 12 weeks? How many across all benefits?

Police Betrayal

Ignore the nonsense at the top. Police will only investigate murder. In 2018, approximately 6.5 million people of working age are receiving state benefits. That's 6.5 million sitting ducks.

I Sue The Police

Graham Wells of Oriel Chambers.Who would think this dapper, unassuming gent would be such a traitorous, morally bereft little shyster.

At the end of 2017, I decided to bite the bullet and sue Merseyside Chief Constable, Andrew Cooke for discrimination in refusing to record and investigate the disability hate crime committed against me, which I have reported over twenty times. I knew this was a long shot and in my claim I stated that if it was contested then it should be heard by a jury of my own peers as all four tribunal judges had violated their oath of office. The police responded with an application to 'strike out' my claim on the grounds that I had no case and it was an abuse of process. I responded by sending the court a letter stating that this was an obvious attempt to circumvent my case being heard by a jury. I knew if my case was heard by a judge, I had 0% chance of winning but 100% chance of winning if heard by a jury. The so-called "hearing" took place at the County Court in Liverpool at 10.30am on 1st May, 2018.



Kangaroo Court

Notorious Nazi judge, Roland Freisler, role model to District Judge, Lee Jenkinson

Kangaroo Court definition: a court that ignores recognised standards of law and justice; a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted.

Needless to say, it was another stitch-up. I'm no lawyer, but I thought a hearing was supposed to allow both parties to put their case and ask questions of the other party etc. I also thought a court official had to be present to record the proceedings. Wrong! At the off, I stated that "if I hadn't been extremely fortunate to recover sufficiently from the encephalitis which almost killed me to investigate what the DWP had done, I would have been wrongly convicted for fraud. I have no doubt of that." I should have saved my breath. All that followed was a confab in low voices between police legal representative, Graham Wells, a dapper gent in a pinstripe suit  and district judge, Lee Jenkinson, who I would describe as a long slithery thing which hisses.

With hindsight, what they were discussing was Wells' direction of Jenkinson to strike out my claim on the excuse that as the DWP hadn't breach my rights under article 2 of the Human Rights Act - the right to life, the police didn't have to investigate the disability hate crime. I was forewarned of this as I received the police Statement of Costs a week and a half before the hearing. Whenever I interjected, Jenkinson looked at me as though I had just stepped on his pet tortoise. When I heard them mention Article 2 of the Human Rights Act and the police didn't have to investigate, I said "hang on, the police must by law, record a hate crime." Jenkinson said the police do not. I continued "There is a mandatory procedure the police must follow when a hate crime is reported." A bit later, "the police swear an oath to uphold our human rights. Aren't we all equal before the law?" Each time Jenkinson just continued his confab with Wells. In my ignorance of the court procedure, I took this gross abuse of the process as constituting the hearing. As far as Jenkinson was concerned, I might as well have not turned up.

In a nutshell, Jenkinson struck out my claim because, as the DWP hadn't killed me, the police didn't have to investigate the crimes the DWP did perpetrate against me. Very reassuring, no doubt, to the millions in receipt of state benefits! Then again, I have never heard of the police investgating a single case of any of the the tens of thousands who have died after having their benefits sanctioned.

After the adjournment, Jenkinson whizzed through our Skeleton Arguments and said he was granting the 'strike out'. Smirking to Wells, he said he would reduce the costs from £5,600 to £4,500 because instead of the two hours allocated it had only taken thirty minutes. That's thirty minutes of humiliation and perverting the course of justice, right in front of me. He then asked me if I had anything to say, to which I replied "I don't accept the decision." I added "what does a member of the public have to do to obtain justice?" and lastly "you don't believe those on benefits have any human rights." Jenkinson has all the human sensitivities of a robot, who like all the other shysters, has perverted the course of justice. His kind of filth is what my father and uncles suffered and died fighting against during WW2. It's truly shocking that these Nazis are running the show now.

I complain to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

Judicial Ombudsman, Paul Kernaghan. Interestingly, in an EU official capacity, in 2009 he advised the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah. He learnt plenty about treating humans like animals.

Not being able to afford to appeal to the Court of Appeal and with the likelihood of my appeal being considered by yet another treasonous shyster, I complained to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office over the behavior of Jenkinson. The obvious grounds being that he perverted the course of justice, citing his taking instructions on his decision from Wells and the fact that the hearing wasn't recorded as it should have been. I received short shrift from another minion, the not so sweet, Laura Honey, who told me my complaint is "outside of the JCIO's remit." So, according to her, it is acceptable conduct for a judge to pervert the course of justice in front of the victim!

On 17th June 2018, shortly after I received this laughable decision, I complained to the office of the Judicial Ombudsman, stating that the JCIO thinks that the legal representative of one side in a hearing instructing the judge of the outcome is acceptable behavior. I also informed them of the reason given by Wells, which was "the only crimes committed by the DWP against those on benefits which the police have a duty to investigate is murder or manslaughter." Adding "This, no doubt, is very reassuring for the millions of U.K. residents who receive state benefits which they are legally entitled to receive."

On 11th July, I received the Ombudsman's decision which echoed that of the JCIO. No surprise as the ombudsman, Kernaghan, was a chief constable and doubtless a member of the same club as the others.

I complain to HM Courts and Tribunals Service

Susan Acland-Hood, CEO of HM Courts & Tribunals Service. Just another jobsworth and complete waste of taxpayers money.

Naturally, unwilling to let Jenkinson get away with perverting the course of justice, I contacted the Crown Prosecution Service. A decent lady named Rachel Kernighan gave me the address of a website called Resolver where I could complain, not about the traitorous behavior of Jenkinson, but the abuse of procedure in the hearing not being recorded. The County Court is actually referred to as a Court of Record for exactly the reason that hearings there are meant to be recorded. This line of complaint came to a dead end and resolved nothing.

After a series of letters between me and officials at Liverpool County Court, I was assured there was a recording of the hearing. How much and what parts, I don't know. I then enquired with a company that produces transcripts what the procedure was. If things weren't crazy enough it got far worse. Firstly, I was told that the release of the transcript requires Jenkinson's approval. Secondly...wait for it.. he can amend the transcript! You read that correctly. Jenkinson can edit the transcript of the hearing!!! The U.K. is not a democracy but a cabalocracy - rule by a cabal.

I was advised to write to HM Courts and Tribunals Service in London. See the document 'HMCTS'

Here a couple of extracts:

"The proof that I have been the victim of a deliberate miscarriage of justice resides in there being a full, audible copy of the hearing available to me. However, I have been informed by a company which issues transcripts that not only the publication of it requires Jenkinson's approval but unbelievably, he can edit it. There is no way that a criminal like Jenkinson is going to allow me a full transcript of the recording whether or not it detected his conversation with Wells unless he was controlling the recording equipment itself and only turned it on and off when it suited him."

"I am making an extremely serious allegation which should be investigated by an independent body. In 2017 I asked several police forces if they discriminated against those on state benefits in the manner of Merseyside Police. North Wales Police assured me it would have recorded my crime report. I therefore request that North Wales Police conduct an investigation into collusion between the DWP, Merseyside Police and HM Courts and Tribunals Service to enable the DWP to defraud those on benefits of their legally entitled benefits."

I sent a copy to the office of my MP, Maria Eagle, asking her to write a letter in support. You see, I haven't lost my sense of humour...she sent me the form to apply for a transcript! I was also told she would not endorse my demand that Jenkinson be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice. No surprise there then.

The chap who told me to write to HMCTS London told me they would answer within15 working days. As they haven't I wrote a follow up letter containing the following:

It is now a month since you received my letter dated 28th August 2018 and you should have listened to the recording of the hearing. This recording should have detected District Judge Jenkinson asking for and receiving instructions from Graham Wells, representing Merseyside Chief Constable Andrew Cooke or didn't detect this as they were speaking in low voices but did record my interjections. Either way, this is clear proof that Jenkinson and Wells perverted the course of justice. There will be other conspirators including Chief Constable Andrew Cooke and whoever it was at HM Courts and Tribunals Service who arranged for the criminal Jenkinson to strike out my claim.

I expect to hear from you shortly that Jenkinson and Wells are to be prosecuted. I should also appreciate an unedited recording or unedited transcript of the hearing.

Yours faithfully,

In spite of being told that the HMCTS Customer Investigations Team would reply to any complaint within 15 working days, on 4th November 2018, I sent the following email to the head of HM Courts and Tribunals Service:

Dear Ms Acland-Hood,

You are either the head of an organisation which employs criminals or are the head of a criminal organisation. I attach copies of two letters I have sent to the HMCTS Customer Investigations Team which are self-explanatory. If you want to know about my case in more detail, you can read my submission to the Public Accounts Committee here:


By burying their heads in the sand, the Customer Investigations Team are abetting a miscarriage of justice. Are you going to do the same?

Yours sincerely,

Philip Grace


On 29th November 2018, I received an email on behalf of Susan Acland-Hood. The author refers to correspondence from Richard Redgrave which I didn't receive and tells me to report my allegation that District Judge Lee Jenkison perverted the course of justice to...wait for it...the police! You really couldn't make it up. I shall reply once again asking for an unedited copy of the recording of the hearing as I have to give the police some evidence. See the document 'You couldn't make it up'




You couldn't make it up