Notorious Nazi judge, Roland Freisler. Role model to District Judge, Lee Jenkinson
Kangaroo Court definition: a court that ignores recognised standards of law and justice; a mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted.
Needless to say, it was another stitch-up. I'm no
lawyer, but I thought a hearing was supposed to allow both parties to put their case and ask questions of the other party etc. I also thought a court official had to be present to record the proceedings. Wrong! At the off, I stated that "if I hadn't been extremely
fortunate to recover sufficiently from the encephalitis which almost killed me to investigate what the DWP had done, I would have been wrongly convicted for fraud. I have no doubt of that." I should have saved my breath. All that followed was a confab in low
voices between police legal representative, Graham Wells, a dapper gent in a pinstripe suit and district judge, Lee Jenkinson, who I would describe as a long slithery thing which hisses.
With hindsight, what they were discussing was Wells'
direction of Jenkinson to strike out my claim on the excuse that as the DWP hadn't breach my rights under article 2 of the Human Rights Act - the right to life, the police didn't have to investigate the disability hate crime. I was forewarned of this as I
received the police Statement of Costs a week and a half before the hearing. Whenever I interjected, Jenkinson looked at me as though I had just stepped on his pet tortoise. When I heard them mention Article 2 of the Human Rights Act and the police didn't
have to investigate, I said "hang on, the police must by law, record a hate crime." Jenkinson said the police do not. I continued "There is a mandatory procedure the police must follow when a hate crime is reported." A bit later, "the police swear an oath
to uphold our human rights. Aren't we all equal before the law?" Each time Jenkinson just continued his confab with Wells. In my ignorance of the court procedure, I took this gross abuse of the process as constituting the hearing. As far as Jenkinson
was concerned, I might as well have not turned up.
In a nutshell, Jenkinson struck out my claim because, as the DWP hadn't killed me, the police didn't have to investigate the crimes the DWP did perpetrate aganst me. Very reassuring, no doubt, to the
millions in receipt of state benefits! Then again, I have never heard of the police investgating a single case of any of the the tens of thousands who have died after having their benefits sanctioned.
After the adjournment, Jenkinson whizzed through
our Skeleton Arguments and said he was granting the 'strike out'. Smirking to Wells, he said he would reduce the costs from £5,600 to £4,500 because instead of the two hours allocated it had only taken thirty minutes. That's thirty
minutes of humiliation and perverting the course of justice, right in front of me. He then asked me if I had anything to say, to which I replied "I don't accept the decision." I added "what does a member of the public have to do to obtain justice?" and lastly
"you don't believe those on benefits have any human rights." Jenkinson has all the human sensitivities of a robot, who like all the other shysters, has perverted the course of justice. His kind of filth is what my father and uncles suffered and died fighting
against during WW2. It's truly shocking that these Nazis are running the show now.