Notorious Nazi judge, Roland Freisler, role model to District Judge, Lee Jenkinson.
At the end of 2017, I decided to bite the bullet and sue Merseyside Chief Constable, Andrew Cooke for discrimination in refusing to record and investigate the disability hate crime committed against me, which I have reported over twenty times. I knew
this was a long shot and in my claim I stated that if it was contested then it should be heard by a jury of my own peers as all four tribunal judges had violated their oath of office. The police responded with an application to 'strike out' my claim on the
grounds that I had no case and it was an abuse of process. I responded by sending the court a letter stating that this was an obvious attempt to circumvent my case being heard by a jury. I knew if my case was heard by a judge, I had 0% chance of winning but
100% chance of winning if heard by a jury. The so-called "hearing" took place at the County Court in Liverpool at 10.30am on 1st May, 2018.
Needless to say, it was another stitch-up. I'm no lawyer, but I thought a hearing was supposed to allow both
parties to put their case and ask questions of the other party etc. Wrong! At the off, I stated that "if I hadn't been extremely fortunate to recover sufficiently from the encephalitis which almost killed me to investigate what the DWP had done, I would have
been wrongly convicted for fraud. I have no doubt of that." I should have saved my breath. All that followed was a confab between the District Judge, Lee Jenkinson and Graham Wells, the lawyer repesenting Merseyside Police; a dapper gent aged about 65,
dressed in a classic pin-stripe suit. I would describe Jenkinson as a long slithery thing which hisses.
With hindsight, what they were discussing, from the outset, was the accuracy of the legal reasoning, provided by Wells, of Jenkinson's excuse to
allow the 'strike out' of my claim. I was forewarned of this as I received the police Statement of Costs a week and a half before the hearing. Whenever I interjected, Jenkinson looked at me as though I had just stepped on his pet tortoise. When I heard them
mention Article 2 of the Human Rights Act and the police didn't have to investigate, I said "hang on, the police must by law, record a hate crime." Jenkinson said the police do not. I continued "There is a mandatory procedure the police must follow when a
hate crime is reported." A bit later, "the police swear an oath to uphold our human rights. Aren't we all equal before the law?" Each time Jenkinson just continued his confab with Wells. In my ignorance of the court procedure, I took this gross abuse of the
process as constituting the hearing. As far as Jenkinson was concerned, I might as well have not turned up.
In a nutshell, Jenkinson struck out my claim because, as the DWP hadn't killed me, the police didn't have to investigate the crimes the
DWP did perpetrate aganst me. Very reassuring, no doubt, to the millions in receipt of state benefits! Then again, I have never heard of the police investgating a single case of any of the the tens of thousands who have died after having their benefits sanctioned.
After the adjournment, Jenkinson whizzed through our Skeleton Arguments and said he was granting the 'strike out'. Smirking to Wells, he said he would reduce the costs from £5,600 to £4,500 because instead of the two hours allocated it
had only taken thirty minutes. That's thirty minutes of humiliation and perverting the course of justice, right in front of me. He then asked me if I had anything to say, to which I replied "I don't accept the decision." I added "what does a member
of the public have to do to obtain justice?" and lastly "you don't believe those on benefits have any human rights." Jenkinson has all the human sensitivities of a robot, who like all the other shysters, has perverted the course of justice. His kind of filth
is what my father and uncles suffered and died fighting against in WW2. It's truly shocking that these Nazis are running the show now.