The great James Cagney in the brilliant "Each Dawn I Die", playing a man framed for a crime committed by others. I know how he feels.
On 10th June 2020 I received the coward Judge Karen Booth's decision denying my appeal. Pathetically or should that be disgracefully, she told me she could have listened to the audio recording but she didn't want to thereby knowingly enabling
a miscarriage of justice.
Having sent correspondence requesting the removal of Judge Lee Jenkinson from office to the following, I can state that the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett of Maldon and the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland
MP are traitorous shysters. The Minister of State for Justice, Kit Malthouse MP, is a pathetic coward.
On 24th January 2020, Judge Karen Booth of the Information Rights Tribunal dismissed my appeal against the ICO's refusal to order
the MOJ to give me a copy of the audio recording of the hearing referred to below. The coward Karen Booth had every right to listen to the recording but chose not to as she would be under an obligation to report District Judge Lee Jenkinson for misconduct.
Insanely, Booth like the ICO used the Freedom of Information Act not to prevent a miscarriage of justice but enable one, confirming that judges are above the law. This shows the lengths the regime will go to prevent the public knowing that the DWP's benefit
sanctions programme is a covert euthanasia programme. It's highly likely that the MOJ has destroyed the audio recording. Naturally, I am appealing.
On 1st May 2018 in the Liverpool County Court, the Nazi-like scum,
District Judge Lee Jenkinson, granted Merseyside Police Chief Constable Andrew Cooke's application to 'strike out' my claim for exemplary damages for discrimination. The following is of great significance:
1. No court official was present
and Jenkinson illegally asked for and received his instructions from Graham Wells, the legal representative of Chief Constable Andrew Cooke, in voices too quiet for the audio recording equipment to detect, meaning it was a Kangaroo Court!
The Skeleton Argument of the Chief Constable stated that the police only have to investigate breaches of Article 2 of the Human Rights Act - The Right to Life and since the Warboys decision in February 2018, Article 3 - Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment.
Meaning, that the DWP and its officials can commit any crime except murder and torture or degrading treatment against those in receipt of state benefits with impunity. In reality, the police don't even investigate breaches of these articles.
3 He acknowledged that I sent a report to Merseyside Police stating that I was the victim of a disability hate crime perpetrated by officials of the DWP.
4. He told me the police don't have to record an allegation
of a hate crime although the police do.
5. He didn't respond when I asked him "aren't we all equal before the law?"
6. After he approved the strike out of my claim which I insisted should be heard by
a jury, he didn't respond when I asked him "so you don't believe those on benefits have any human rights?" [For further details, see the Court page]
When I published this site in June 2016, I wanted to inform people
how easy it is for the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to swindle benefit recipients out of their benefits and in many cases, criminalise them too.
I have now discovered what seems incredible: for at least the last 16 years, officials of
the DWP have been able to commit any crime they want against those receiving state benefits, primarily to deny them their benefits, with complete impunity. This is because chief constables have ordered every one of their officers to violate their oath of office,
known as the 'oath of attestation', by refusing to even record such crimes. This discrimination is completely illegal under EU and British law. The pathetic excuse the police give for this illegal discrimination is that "the DWP is a statutory body with its
own complaints procedure."
The so-called, Independent Police Complaints Commission, colludes with the police by parroting the same 'statutory body' mantra to dismiss complaints and appeals.
During those 16 years, approximately 6.5 million
benefit recipients have been sanctioned.
From my own research, I have no doubt whatsoever, that the overwhelming majority of those sanctioned have been defrauded of their benefits,
with the number of deaths as a result, since 2,000, in the region of 200,000 (extrapolating the 10,600 figure for
The Nazi regime did something similar to rid Germany of "useless eaters" and the regime here just uses another method.